- From: triple-underscore via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 01:03:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The updated [inherit counters algorithm](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-lists-3/#inherit-counters) by [this commit](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/ad9a4bc6e6397b6fb66721828e66eb84e73a0c4f) would not produce correct result in certain cases, because it makes elements not inherit a nested counter instantiated by any preceding sibling, due to step 3 of the algorithm: > Let sibling counters be the CSS counters set of element’s preceding sibling (if it has one), or an empty CSS counters set otherwise. > For each counter of sibling counters, if element counters does not already contain a counter with the same name, append a copy of counter to element counters. So, for the following case (no increment), for example: ``` div::before { content: "(" counters(foo,'.') ")"; } <div style="counter-reset: foo"> <div style="counter-reset: foo"></div> <div></div> </div> ``` According to the algorithm, If my interpretation is correct, the second inner div will only inherit it's parent's counters named `foo`, but ignores the same named nested counter instantiated by the first inner div, and it would produce: ``` (0) (0.0) (0) ``` But browsers renders this as: ``` (0) (0.0) (0.0) ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by triple-underscore Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5477#issuecomment-729308876 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2020 01:03:51 UTC