Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Define containing block for stickypos internal table elements (#5020)

It's the "sticky failures" day at TablesNG manor.
Here is a test case: https://wptest.center/#/1vb898 (my first time using wptest)
It applies sticky constraints table parts, scrolls, and observes part position.

I am testing for the most common behavior in current browsers which is:
"Table wrapper fragment is the sticky container for all table parts"

Results:

// FF 82: pass
// Chrome legacy: TD pass, TR/TBODY fail, sticky treated as static
// Edge 17:TD pass, TR/TBODY fail, sticky treated as static
// Safari: TD/TR fail creatively, TBODY pass.

For TD, sticky container being Table wrapper matches widest current behavior. 
If we adopt this for TD, makes sense to do it for TR too.


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by atotic
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5020#issuecomment-728659603 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2020 03:16:45 UTC