W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > November 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Define containing block for stickypos internal table elements (#5020)

From: Aleksandar Totic via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 03:16:43 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-728659603-1605583002-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
It's the "sticky failures" day at TablesNG manor.
Here is a test case: https://wptest.center/#/1vb898 (my first time using wptest)
It applies sticky constraints table parts, scrolls, and observes part position.

I am testing for the most common behavior in current browsers which is:
"Table wrapper fragment is the sticky container for all table parts"


// FF 82: pass
// Chrome legacy: TD pass, TR/TBODY fail, sticky treated as static
// Edge 17:TD pass, TR/TBODY fail, sticky treated as static
// Safari: TD/TR fail creatively, TBODY pass.

For TD, sticky container being Table wrapper matches widest current behavior. 
If we adopt this for TD, makes sense to do it for TR too.

GitHub Notification of comment by atotic
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5020#issuecomment-728659603 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2020 03:16:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:22 UTC