W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > November 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Note implies losing an aspect-ratio when it shouldn't? (#5713)

From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:26:53 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-727596971-1605457612-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Well, the term "intrinsic size" has been used with different meanings ^_^ (#4961). Here it links to [CSS Images](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-images-3/#intrinsic-dimensions), which seems to refer to what from now on should be called "natural size". And your `<div>` doesn't have a natural size (it's not replaced). Or, even if actually refers to the intrinsic size, https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-4/#aspect-ratio-automatic says

> When a box has a preferred aspect ratio, its automatic sizes are calculated the same as for a replaced element with an intrinsic aspect ratio and **no intrinsic dimension** in that axis

So the "use the stretch fit into that size for the inline size and calculate the block size using the aspect ratio" should apply, like SVGs.

GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5713#issuecomment-727596971 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 15 November 2020 16:26:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:22 UTC