- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:26:53 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Well, the term "intrinsic size" has been used with different meanings ^_^ (#4961). Here it links to [CSS Images](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-images-3/#intrinsic-dimensions), which seems to refer to what from now on should be called "natural size". And your `<div>` doesn't have a natural size (it's not replaced). Or, even if actually refers to the intrinsic size, https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-4/#aspect-ratio-automatic says > When a box has a preferred aspect ratio, its automatic sizes are calculated the same as for a replaced element with an intrinsic aspect ratio and **no intrinsic dimension** in that axis So the "use the stretch fit into that size for the inline size and calculate the block size using the aspect ratio" should apply, like SVGs. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5713#issuecomment-727596971 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 15 November 2020 16:26:55 UTC