- From: Ian Kilpatrick via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 22:58:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> What's the point of having them as different values, then? My answer would be - for the default behaviour switch between replaced and non-replaced elements. So there are two clear options here. 1) Define a "strong" stretch, and a "weak" stretch. E.g. if you have `justify-self: stretch` this is a "strong" stretch, `justify-self: normal` is a "weak" stretch. The priority list for this would be something like: - "weak" stretch alignment. - aspect-ratio transferred size. - "strong" stretch alignment. - definite size. 2) Define an aspect-ratio transferred size as have higher priority than stretch alignment, e.g. - stretch alignment. - aspect-ratio transferred size. - definite size. I prefer (2) as I somewhat view a aspect-ratio with a definite size in the opposite axis the same as, a definite size in the original axis. @fantasai any thoughts? -- GitHub Notification of comment by bfgeek Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5713#issuecomment-727075301 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 13 November 2020 22:58:10 UTC