- From: Noam Rosenthal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 19:27:13 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Looks nice! I like the by/to distinction, seems like a reasonable way to handle the rel/abs distinction. > > The only thing I don't like is the `horizontal`/`vertical` keywords, because they're so long; it's shorter to just type `line 0 X` instead of `vertical X`. I think we can get away with just shortening those to `h` and `v`. The thing is that with absolute coordinates, `line to X 0` is not the same as `horizontal to X`. I was thinking as an alternative to use the `auto` keyword (`line to X auto` and `line to auto Y`). WDYT? Something about the one-character EBNF feels less readable to me, but maybe just for h/v it's OK. -- GitHub Notification of comment by noamr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/5711#issuecomment-726988798 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 13 November 2020 19:27:14 UTC