- From: Rami Yushuvaev via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 19:11:09 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@tabatkins you label this as "**selectors-5**". But @Loirooriol wrote that `:nth-children()` is the most feasible feature and not complex compare to `:has()` and `:has-child()` (#4903) which is labeled as "**selectors-4**". Can you change this issue label to "**selectors-4**" ? -- GitHub Notification of comment by ramiy Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5694#issuecomment-723652706 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Sunday, 8 November 2020 19:11:10 UTC