W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > November 2020

[csswg-drafts] [css-conditional-3]: Inconsistent phrasing around placement of @import rules (#5697)

From: Jeffrey Yasskin via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 01:14:09 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-736530164-1604538848-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
jyasskin has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-conditional-3]: Inconsistent phrasing around placement of @import rules ==
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-3/#contents-of talks about `@import` being disallowed inside conditional rules, but doesn't use the same **must** language as https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-3/#use. Unless there's something I'm missing about CSS editorial style, these should probably be consistent.

https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-3/#use is phrased as restricting where `@import` rules can appear, but if that were actually its purpose, it ought to repeat or be unified with the restriction from https://drafts.csswg.org/css-conditional-3/#contents-of that `@import` and friends can't appear inside a conditional rule. But I think it's actually specifying that conditional rules must not appear *before* `@import` and friends. If that's your intent, it might be clearer to say it that way.

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5697 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 5 November 2020 01:14:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 19 October 2021 01:31:35 UTC