- From: Majid Valipour via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 14:40:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I agree that we should match the `animation-name` semantic as close as possible here. I don't have any particular opinion for the changes proposed for computed value of animation-name. Do you want to send a PR to css-animations to change the semantic of that and then we will update scroll-animations-1 to match that? BTW, we should perhaps upstream animation-timeline to css-animations. Feel free to own that as well. :) -- GitHub Notification of comment by majido Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5112#issuecomment-636010558 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 29 May 2020 14:40:02 UTC