W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > May 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-3] Should enclosed counting rods / tai xuan jing / yi jing hexagrams be space-discarding? (#4993)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 16:58:36 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-634802089-1590598715-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-text-3] Should enclosed counting rods / tai xuan jing / yi jing hexagrams be space-discarding?`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Close no change`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: [css-text-3] Should enclosed counting rods / tai xuan jing / yi jing hexagrams be space-discarding?<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4993#issuecomment-633723924<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Line breaks between these character categories are dropped. Do we include these symbols in that set? Prop in issue is no<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Reason is to keep hexagrams consistent with misc symbols block. koji and I think this is good idea, checking with WG. Prop: close no change<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Richard's opinion?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Mentioned countring rods might be used in western context so keeping space is better idea. That's in favor of no change<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Other comments?<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Prop: Close no change to current spec<br>
&lt;florian> +1<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Anything clarifying?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: No, it's an explicit list of codepoints<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Close no change<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4993#issuecomment-634802089 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2020 16:58:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:07 UTC