Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries] Which levels should the dynamic-range and video-* media features be in (#5042)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `[mediaqueries] Which levels should the dynamic-range and video-* media features be in`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: put dynamic-range and video-* in MQ L5`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic:  [mediaqueries] Which levels should the dynamic-range and video-* media features be in<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5042<br>
&lt;dael> florian: Given this the video things it's a strong signal these are not CR ready<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Yeah, definitely 5<br>
&lt;AmeliaBR> s/this/the other open issues/<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Prop: put dynamic range and video-* in MQ L5<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Objections?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: put dynamic-range and video-* in MQ L5<br>
&lt;dael> florian: We're close to republish CR of MQ4. If anyone doesn't agree it's a good time to look. Once i"m done reviewing I'll request one<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5042#issuecomment-634772251 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2020 16:10:40 UTC