> We also have a long term ambition to fully obsolete CSS2, which will then lead to the question as to where the normative definition of Level 2 will live. I don't think we *will* have a normative definition of Level 2 at that point. It'll be obsoleted just as much as CSS 1 is. We're not far from that point already. > At the moment if we make a backwards incompatible change to Level 4, our practice is to make behaviour undefined/optional in L2 and L3 (and ignore L1), I don't think that's our practice, either? CSS2 had a lot of stuff declared undefined near the end of its process, not because of backwards-incompatible changes in the level 3 module, but because the behavior wasn't yet consistent between browsers and so we couldn't get 2+ passes for tests for any reasonable defined behavior. Since then, I don't think we've gone back and undefined things because of a change in later versions, have we? We sometimes remove things because we prefer the levels to not *contradict* each other, just for confusion-avoidance reasons, but there's no sense in which an earlier level is a meaningful artifact which an implementor can decide to support vs a later level. They're just previous versions of the current document, is all. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5114#issuecomment-634288983 using your GitHub accountReceived on Tuesday, 26 May 2020 21:27:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:07 UTC