- From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 09:03:44 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Crissov has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-fonts] Pseudo-generic font families == Several actual (Western) typeface names are sometimes used generically, in that there are either metrically compatible clones (with more liberal licenses) or multiple digitizations of the same lead-era typeface. Should implementations explicitly be allowed to treat them more like keywords in `<'font-family'>` if they are not quoted, i.e. choose an alternative font that is available? This would primarily affect the set of Microsoftʼs [Core fonts for the Web](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Core_fonts_for_the_Web), which also contain the de facto standard mappings for the generic font families `serif` (_Times_ or _Times New Roman_), `sans-serif` (_Arial_) and `monospace` (_Courier_ or _Courier New_). Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5065 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 13 May 2020 09:03:46 UTC