- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 19:28:22 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm fine with that... but I'm not sure that all layouts clearly define the containing block. E.g. https://drafts.csswg.org/css-multicol/#the-multi-column-model > These column boxes establish an independent block formatting context into which the multi-column container’s content flows, and form the containing block for its non-positioned children. works great for `position: static`, but not for `position: relative`. I guess it ends up being fine since the column boxes are block containers, so it will be covered by the future Flow Layout spec, but it's a bit confusing. Maybe CSS Position could defer the definition of the containing block of a static, relative, or sticky box to the formatting context, but specify that these 3 cases must have the same containing block -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3253#issuecomment-627545679 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2020 19:28:24 UTC