W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > May 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [meta] [css-fonts] Criteria for generic font families (#4910)

From: Fuqiao Xue via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 11:39:40 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-627290122-1589283579-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> > I have not noticed such usage in Japanese fwiw, but in Chinese...
> 
> It is common in Japanese too. I think it is a general requirement to style an "alternate voice" in different fonts, and italics/oblique don't work well in Japanese either. Which one to use instead isn't very well standardized, vary by the author and the situation, but usually a specific group of families that represents the author's intention best, such as serif/sans-serif, rounded, Kaisho, Reishotai, Kointai, (the last three examples are Japanese specific families) etc.

As an example, Japanese Gothic typefaces are often used for highlighting/emphasis when the main text is in a Mincho typeface. This usage is documented in [jlreq](https://w3c.github.io/jlreq/#h-note-129) (see also https://tsutawarudesign.com/miyasuku/miyasuku-56.svg for an illustration).

(I will refrain from giving more examples. I think examples are more suitable for issues for specific generic font families, rather than this meta issue.)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by xfq
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4910#issuecomment-627290122 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 12 May 2020 11:39:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:06 UTC