- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 May 2020 16:33:00 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> The last value is the closest that we have to "author's intent". My point is that the last value isn't guaranteed to be closer to their intent than *any other value*. That said, > Also, we are talking about media queries that could apply to media that is not being frequently tested/verified. ...this is pretty reasonable, and does lean me towards clamping rather than invalidating large values. > If you mean putting calc() at the switch itself, that prevents explicit invalidation because calc() is supposed to clamp. Yes, that's what I was saying. ^_^ -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5009#issuecomment-625900301 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 8 May 2020 16:33:05 UTC