W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > May 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Reconsider the definition of "first available font" (#4796)

From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 23:28:30 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-625547447-1588894109-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

And it does not matter whether the font actually has a glyph for that character?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4796#issuecomment-625547447 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 7 May 2020 23:28:32 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain] Add contain-paint-margin CSS property (#4934)"
Previous message: Majid Valipour via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-1] Allow setting timeline in Element.animate() (#5013)"
Maybe in reply to: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Reconsider the definition of "first available font" (#4796)"
Next in thread: Koji Ishii via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Reconsider the definition of "first available font" (#4796)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:06 UTC