W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > May 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-decor] Clarifying skip-ink:auto behavior in relation to CJK text (#4276)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 15:21:08 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-624713965-1588778467-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Clarifying skip-ink:auto behavior in relation to CJK text`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Accept PR #4737, close issue #4276`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;astearns> topic: Clarifying skip-ink:auto behavior in relation to CJK text<br>
&lt;astearns> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4276<br>
&lt;fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4737/files<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: There's a PR from jfkthame about this issue. Looks correct to me, wanted to check with the WG<br>
&lt;fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4276<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> astearns: I see myles had a question that was answered in the issue<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> myles: It looks like an issue to me, not a PR<br>
&lt;fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4737/files<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> AmeliaBR: The last part of th eedit is an in-spec issue asking for other non-CJK scripts which want this behavior.<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> AmeliaBR: Is that something to discuss now, or leave until later?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> fantasai: Later. That's a question for ipmls and i18n<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> astearns: So proposed reoslution is to accept the PR and close this issue. Objections?<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Accept PR #4737, close issue #4276<br>

GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4276#issuecomment-624713965 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2020 15:21:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:06 UTC