- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 15:21:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Clarifying skip-ink:auto behavior in relation to CJK text`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Accept PR #4737, close issue #4276` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <astearns> topic: Clarifying skip-ink:auto behavior in relation to CJK text<br> <astearns> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4276<br> <fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4737/files<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: There's a PR from jfkthame about this issue. Looks correct to me, wanted to check with the WG<br> <fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4276<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: I see myles had a question that was answered in the issue<br> <TabAtkins> myles: It looks like an issue to me, not a PR<br> <fantasai> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4737/files<br> <TabAtkins> AmeliaBR: The last part of th eedit is an in-spec issue asking for other non-CJK scripts which want this behavior.<br> <TabAtkins> AmeliaBR: Is that something to discuss now, or leave until later?<br> <TabAtkins> fantasai: Later. That's a question for ipmls and i18n<br> <TabAtkins> astearns: So proposed reoslution is to accept the PR and close this issue. Objections?<br> <TabAtkins> RESOLVED: Accept PR #4737, close issue #4276<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4276#issuecomment-624713965 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2020 15:21:14 UTC