Re: [csswg-drafts] Time to assume implementations of CSS are using the DOM? (#4888)

@frivoal Fine for XML, not an issue; for other uses like Gtk3+ it really feels like someone needs to define how their model maps to the model in the spec, and I don't think it really makes any real difference whether that's the current vaguely defined thing or the DOM? I don't think describing it in terms of the DOM should be black-box observable for implementations that don't expose the document tree?

@faceless2 That sounds fine, really; as long as there's something isomorphic to the DOM it shouldn't be a problem.

Mostly I'm concerned about making sure things with shadow elements is well-defined in CSS, and we haven't added any notion of shadow elements to our document model as far as I'm aware, we just rely on hand-waving there.

GitHub Notification of comment by gsnedders
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 19 March 2020 11:01:24 UTC