W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > June 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4] Should aspect-ratio affect the intrinsic size? (#5032)

From: Christian Biesinger via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 18:28:35 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-644300537-1592245714-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

(I think the `overflow` comment was in regards to https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-4/#aspect-ratio-minimum)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by cbiesinger
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5032#issuecomment-644300537 using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 15 June 2020 18:28:37 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images-4] Added <element()> to <image> data type (#5171)"
Previous message: fantasai via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4] Should aspect-ratio affect the intrinsic size? (#5032)"
Maybe in reply to: fantasai via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4] Should aspect-ratio affect the intrinsic size? (#5032)"
Next in thread: Ian Kilpatrick via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4] Should aspect-ratio affect the intrinsic size? (#5032)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:09 UTC