- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 20:43:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Issue 1: Yup, it's intended to be the same as the "using the shrink factor" one, so your suggestion is spot on. Issue 2: Yup, only one gets chosen. The fourth option was indeed a no-op; presumably a leftover from an earlier version? Dunno. Anyway, accepted your suggested edits. Issue 3: Ah yup, indeed, unfrozen items can skip getting a target main size. Accepted your edits. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5179#issuecomment-642918532 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 11 June 2020 20:43:20 UTC