- From: James Craig via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 23:29:50 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Using @media (prefers-contrast) evaluates true for everything except `no-preference` I understand this, and I was heavily involved in defining this behavior with `prefers-reduced-motion` in order to keep the syntax flexible. (E.g. it could also match something more specific in the future if needed like `no-parallax`). The `no-preference` boolean behavior also worked well with the original proposal for contrast, which was: `prefers-increased-contrast: [no-preference] | increase | high` But now with name change and the addition of `low` and `forced` a boolean match for “prefers contrast” can also mean: - low, aka “does not prefer contrast” - forced, which is not conveying a preference for the author to style but a state that the author is forced to deal with and should react to. IMO, `forced-colors` is a much better landing spot and naming convention for this concept. -- GitHub Notification of comment by cookiecrook Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3856#issuecomment-642319215 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2020 23:29:51 UTC