W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > June 2020

Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] The definition of BFC does not include flex item (#5143)

From: 彼術向 via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 02:03:51 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.closed-628516672-1591668230-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

Mookiepiece closed this issue. See https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5143

Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2020 02:04:17 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: 彼術向 via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] The definition of BFC does not include flex item (#5143)"
Previous message: Leandro RR via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] Add background-rotate property that we just have to rotate the background without affecting the text and only one layer (#3183)"
In reply to: 彼術向 via GitHub: "[csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] The definition of BFC does not includes flex item (#5143)"
Next in thread: 彼術向 via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] The definition of BFC does not include flex item (#5143)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:09 UTC