- From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 11:15:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Hmm, my bad, I guess it's covered by "4. Avoiding cycles with layout". I think this is the first spec which resolves `em`, `%` etc against "the previous frame", I'm not sure whether we should worry about that or not, but I'll close this until I can think of a specific reason for why it would be a problem. -- GitHub Notification of comment by andruud Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5185#issuecomment-640539546 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 8 June 2020 11:15:59 UTC