Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] The definition of BFC does not include flex item (#5143)

@SelenIT 
I think that's fine at first, but **we are making things complex**. You can see [that page](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Guide/CSS/Block_formatting_context) once more, we need change that list into "floats without display:flex" "position:absolute without display:flex" "overflow:hidden without display:flex"

FFC is BFC with flex layout, they are not the same, I know, and I don't think other CSS leaners are willing to know that.

@Loirooriol 
I reminded that an `inline-block` also establishes a new BFC, display:inline-flex is inline too. they are not block-level box, they don't match the "very loosely" one.

> SelenIT: Regarding flex items (and grid items as well), I believe they fall under the first meaning

I think I don't have misunderstood the words "one of" and "very loosely" in spec. I mean, **I thought the very loosely one will include all the cases**.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by Mookiepiece
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5143#issuecomment-637927354 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2020 03:15:20 UTC