W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > July 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-line-breaking] Soft-break vs. <br>, inside embedded opposiate directional run (#5121)

From: Najib Tounsi via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 09:12:12 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-652889444-1593681131-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

@fantasai Thank you for clarifications and the editorial change. 

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by ntounsi
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5121#issuecomment-652889444 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 2 July 2020 09:12:14 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Najib Tounsi via GitHub: "Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-line-breaking] Soft-break vs. <br>, inside embedded opposiate directional run (#5121)"
Previous message: andruud via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations-1] Effects for scroll linked animations are not inclusive at max scroll (#5223)"
Maybe in reply to: fantasai via GitHub: "Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-line-breaking] Soft-break vs. <br>, inside embedded opposiate directional run (#5121)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:11 UTC