Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-gcpm-3] page group example is incorrect and specificity of nth() is undefined (#3524)

As I'm investigating this, it seems that at least some implementations force a page break when a named page is invoked. The example works as expected in both PrinceXML and WeasyPrint without adding a page-break property. 

I think GCPM is wrong here. [CSS Pages says](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-page-3/#using-named-pages) that implementations introduce a forced page break if necessary: 

> The page property is used to specify a particular type of page (called a named page
) on which an element must be displayed. If necessary, a forced page break is introduced and a new page generated of the specified type.

I would propose deleting the text " that also has a forced break property applied" from GCPM.  



-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dauwhe
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3524#issuecomment-590988998 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2020 18:04:41 UTC