Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Reconsider the definition of "first available font" (#4796)

Related: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1800 https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1804 and

> [WebKit doesn’t do this; it just uses the primary font, and if the primary font doesn’t support “0” then it uses that font’s .notdef glyph. No downloads necessary](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3135#issue-362776570).

and

> [So my preference would be an ordered list of things to try:

 *   the width of the "0" glyph. if it doesn't have one,
 *   the width of the .notdef glyph. if it doesn't have one (and thus, the font is broken),
 *  use 0.5em](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3135#issuecomment-424837225)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4796#issuecomment-589798428 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 21 February 2020 19:24:51 UTC