- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 17:19:42 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `css-contain] it should be clearer that size containment inhibits effects of contents on intrinsic sizes`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Accept propose as phrased in comment from florian` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic: css-contain] it should be clearer that size containment inhibits effects of contents on intrinsic sizes<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4741<br> <dael> dbaron: I don't think this is controversial but it seemed to me it should be implied by size containment it doesn't impact intrinsic size in addition to final computed size<br> <dael> dbaron: Ran into this while writing something that referenced size containment.<br> <dael> florian: Agree it was the intent. Prop rephrasing in the issue to clarify. dbaron said he was fine.<br> <dael> florian: [reads original sentence]<br> <dael> florian: Would insert including when computed as intrinsic size. Suggest we add to L2. Clarification so I'll prob edit into L1 too.<br> <dael> Rossen_: Proposed resolution?<br> <dael> florian: Accept propose as phrased in comment<br> <dael> Rossen_: Obj?<br> <dael> RESOLVED: Accept propose as phrased in comment from florian<br> <dael> fantasai: Republish a REC?<br> <dael> florian: Rather not, not worth process hassle<br> <dael> florian: Happy to update ED so if we do need to update REC it's folded in<br> <dael> Rossen_: fantasai do you feel strong to republish?<br> <dael> fantasai: Not super strong. Want to keep things in sync but this is minor<br> <dael> fantasai: I do want us...if something doesn't effect sizing it should mean any type of sizing. I don't think clarification is a problem but I think problem if "Size" doesn't mean "instrinsic size"<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4741#issuecomment-585316698 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2020 17:19:54 UTC