- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 22:46:08 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> For you, it might. No, my argument is that it suffices for everyone. I don't believe there are common use-cases where an exact value of phi is meaningfully distinguishable from 1.6. (Unlike pi, where a small difference can result in something *not* being a full circle, etc.) As with many of your proposed suggestions, use-cases would be appreciated; some things I can come up with reasonable justifications for on my own, but for everything else I'm going to reject unless someone brings up a good use-case for it. (If people want to generate maximally-dense spirals, for instance, an exact value of phi is worthwhile, and very noticeably different from 1.6. Evidence that this is useful in CSS would be appreciated.) > If phi isnĘžt worth adding, nothing beyond pi and e is. FWIW, I suspect this is the case. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4702#issuecomment-584395411 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 10 February 2020 22:46:10 UTC