Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Let :is() have better error-recovery behavior than normal Selectors (#3264)

I'm all for this, but it will interact surprisingly with selector nesting, since `a, b { & c, &d {}}` becomes `:is(a, b) c, :is(a, b), d{}`.

It makes nesting forgetful except at the last level... So `c` or `d` resulting in a parsing error will cause the rejection of the last nesting level.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by pygy
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3264#issuecomment-582983187 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 6 February 2020 16:18:01 UTC