- From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:36:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The CSS Working Group just discussed `Let's make snapshot 2020 while the year is still young`. <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic: Let's make snapshot 2020 while the year is still young<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4715<br> <TabAtkins> page-size I don't care about, nobody uses it. background-size is a reasonable counter-argument; we're inconsistent either way. :(<br> <dael> chris: I wanted to start. Last time we did a snapshot was a while ago. We were trying to publish at beginning of year.<br> <dael> chris: Nothing to propose, but I'd like people to look and comment and add what spec you want.<br> <dael> chris: Also discussion on what snapshot should mean. Would prefer that separate unless it resolves quickly. Would like to get a snapshot out.<br> <dael> florian: Would say we aim for a ready to approve snapshot by next F2F. Let github discussion happen and then someone, maybe me, can write a draft<br> <dael> florian: Important part is the few things that ought to be in snapshot and missing one pub. we should deal with them first<br> <dael> chris: There is an issue with the FPWD we agreed to pub. Separate thing I need to deal with. fantasai the patch tool isn't working, I might not be doing it right.<br> <dael> fantasai: Let's talk about it.<br> <dael> astearns: Sounds like plan is hash out what goes into snapshot in the issue with reminders on calls. Have a draft ready before we meet in Cork?<br> <dael> chris: Sounds great<br> <dael> astearns: Changes to the schedule?<br> <dael> jensimmons: Just a comment about scope of snapshot convo to be about snapshot. I agree. There does seem to be a growing convo about if we should define css 4 or a more marketing term. I agree that's a separate thing. THe snapshot is a function of the WG. It's a good idea to consider something like css 4 but that's a different topic<br> <dael> astearns: Might be good to raise a separate issue on the messaging. We should keep this github to publishing the snapshot we've engaged in producing.<br> <dael> astearns: Anything else on snapshot?<br> <dael> astearns: Please do look. There are a number of questions about which drafts should go in.<br> <florian> I'll make an ED today, so that we can start to iterate.<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4715#issuecomment-582680750 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 6 February 2020 00:36:50 UTC