- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 23:43:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@tabatkins So I guess `round(strategy, ±∞, ±∞)` should also depend on `strategy`? - `round(up, +∞, ±∞) = ∞` - `round(up, −∞, ±∞) = NaN` since the limit in not unique, e.g. ``` lim_{x→−∞} round(up, x, 2x) = −0 lim_{x→−∞} round(up, x, x) = −∞ ``` - `round(down, −∞, ±∞) = −∞` - `round(down, +∞, ±∞) = NaN` since the limit in not unique, e.g. ``` lim_{x→+∞} round(down, x, 2x) = +0 lim_{x→+∞} round(down, x, x) = +∞ ``` - `round(to-zero, ±∞, ±∞) = NaN` since the limit in not unique, e.g. ``` lim_{x→±∞} round(to-zero, x, 2x) = ±0 lim_{x→±∞} round(to-zero, x, x) = ±∞ ``` - `round(nearest, ±∞, ±∞) = NaN` since the limit in not unique, e.g. ``` lim_{x→±∞} round(nearest, x, 3x) = ±0 lim_{x→±∞} round(nearest, x, x) = ±∞ ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4725#issuecomment-581673513 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 3 February 2020 23:43:34 UTC