W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > August 2020

[csswg-drafts] [accent-color] Should interoperability be a goal for the `accent-color` spec? (#5480)

From: Mason Freed via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 23:00:34 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-687595307-1598569232-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
mfreed7 has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [accent-color] Should interoperability be a goal for the `accent-color` spec? ==
In the [discussion](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5187) about the `accent-color` spec, the question of interoperability is central. Should interoperability be a goal for this feature? Or is it ok for different implementations to interpret/use the `accent-color` value(s) in different ways?

For example, is it ok for some implementations to use the `accent-color` to paint the background of a glyph, and other implementations to use it instead for the foreground glyph image? Or should we attempt to use `accent-color` in the same general way, across implementations, where possible?

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5480 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2020 23:00:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:13 UTC