- From: Phil Cunliffe via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:49:28 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
>From what I hear, as long as image orientation is respected, and image-orientation css is used for backwards compatibility, IMO there is no solution but to close this issue and let that leakage be. (intrinsic image resolution is a different story, as it doesn't have significant backwards compatibility implications). This would work for us, but in an ideal world we would like to respect EXIF orientation as well. In our use-case respecting EXIF orientation requires knowing the orientation value itself. This was the original impetus behind this pull-request from @heycam https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/5603 which would put orientation into parity with width and height. -- GitHub Notification of comment by philcunliffe Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5165#issuecomment-681059025 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2020 18:49:30 UTC