W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > August 2020

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3]: Voluntary semicolons (#5413)

From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 16:06:01 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-676517636-1597853160-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The CSS Working Group just discussed `[css-syntax-3]: Voluntary semicolons`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: Reject proposal, no change to semicolons`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: [css-syntax-3]: Voluntary semicolons<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5413<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: I rejected but b/c syntax status we need wg approval. Commentor suggested we allow ; after declarations to be voluntary<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Producing something like JS automatic ; injection<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Rejected, I don't think it's good in JS and don't want to spread. Good indentation design is fine, but having this maybe and maybe not is bad<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Seeking WG approval to reject and we're not adding ; optional<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: I believe in the issue comments there's agreement from group members<br>
&lt;astearns> +1 to reject<br>
&lt;hober> +1<br>
&lt;miriam> +1<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Yeah. florian and astearns commented in issue saying not to add<br>
&lt;jfkthame> +1<br>
&lt;fantasai> +1<br>
&lt;dauwhe_> +1<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Any objections to Reject proposal, no change to semicolons<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Reject proposal, no change to semicolons<br>

GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5413#issuecomment-676517636 using your GitHub account

Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 19 August 2020 16:06:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:42:13 UTC