- From: James Craig via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 21:56:54 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm available at [2020-08-12 T 16:00 GMT](https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20200812T16) (this Wednesday at 9 AM Pacific) to discuss. Ideally I'd like to see a useful boolean match (or otherwise very short authoring match) for `prefers-contrast`… I think this could be achieved a few different ways: Updating my proposal list from above: **Option 1: Change the current value `high` to `increase`.** ```css prefers-contrast: [ no-preference | increase ] /* the `increase` value can match both the iOS/macOS "increased" contrast and Windows "high" or "max" contrast settings. */ ``` **Option 2: Change `high` value to `max` and add new value `increase`.** Allows distinction between the different settings, but authors would likely ```css prefers-contrast: [ no-preference | increase | max ] ``` Forego `low` or `decrease` value until any native platform implements a feature that makes the distinction from `forced-colors` necessary. **Common Usage: Same.** In both proposals above, the 99.9% author usage case would be to use the boolean shorthand below, which would match all currently known "increased" or "max" contrast setting implementations. ```css @media (prefers-contrast) ``` -- GitHub Notification of comment by cookiecrook Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2943#issuecomment-671610057 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 10 August 2020 21:56:56 UTC