Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-inline-3] Propose N/A value for em-top and em-bottom baselines (#5380)

In my mind, at least, em-top and em-bottom are expected to provide the alignment positions used by Canvas2d `textBaseline=top` and `bottom`, so they can't be undefined or zero or whatever.

The [html spec](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/canvas.html#dom-context-2d-textbaseline) calls for "the top [or bottom, respectively] of the em square", and its accompanying illustration makes it clear they're expected to be 1em apart, even if that means they're inside the font's ascent/descent. So there needs to be some definition of what they mean even for a Latin font with no BASE table.

(I suspect most use cases would be better served by `ascent` and `descent` options, but the `top` and `bottom` values are long-established. They're not very interoperable at the moment because of the lack of a clear definition, which I'm hoping this will provide.)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by jfkthame
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5380#issuecomment-668531386 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2020 11:05:52 UTC