- From: Chris Lilley via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:51:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
svgeesus has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:
== I18n self-review of CSS Color 4 ==
Short i18n review checklist is [here](http://w3c.github.io/i18n-activity/reviews/shortchecklist)
1. [ ] _If the spec (or its implementation) contains any natural language text that will be read by a human (this includes error messages or other UI text, JSON strings, etc, etc),_
No
2. [x] _If the spec (or its implementation) allows content authors to produce typographically appealing text, either in its own right, or in association with graphics._
No
3. [ ] _If the spec (or its implementation) allows the user to point into text, creates text fragments, concatenates text, allows the user to select or step through text (using a cursor or other methods), etc._
No
4. [ ] _If the spec (or its implementation) allows searching or matching of text, including syntax and identifiers_
No
5. [ ] _If the spec (or its implementation) sorts text_
No
6. [ ] _If the spec (or its implementation) captures user input_
No
7. [ ] _If the spec (or its implementation) deals with time in any way that will be read by humans and/or crosses time zone boundaries_
No
8. [ ] _If the spec (or its implementation) allows any character encoding other than UTF-8._
No
9. [ ] _If the spec (or its implementation) defines markup._
No
10. [ ] _If the spec (or its implementation) deals with names, addresses, time & date formats, etc_
No
11. [ ] _If the spec (or its implementation) describes a format or data that is likely to need localization._
No
12. [ ] _If the spec (or its implementation) makes any reference to or relies on any cultural norms_
Yes, some color choices have associations which vary by culture.
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5034 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 30 April 2020 20:51:50 UTC