Re: [csswg-drafts] [meta] [css-fonts] Criteria for adding new generic font families (#4910)

Issues (some closed) whose resolution _could_ be informed by this meta-issue:

- [Proposal for a new generic font family "Rounded"](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4605)
- [The Cursive = Chinese Kaiti equivalent](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4606)
- [Should we start a registry for additional generic fonts?](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4566)
- [which generic in a font-family list influences system fallback?](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4562)
- [Inconsistency between `monospace` and `ui-monospaced`](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4469)
- [Add a ui-sans-serif keyword to go with ui-serif](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4468)
- [Don't require browsers to always match every generic font family to a concrete font family](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4442)
- [What does fangsong map to for non chinese text](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4425)
- [Specify what generic font family maps to nastaliq](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4397)
- [system-ui-serif, system-ui-monospace, and system-ui-rounded](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4107)
- [Should emoji be restricted in its range?](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2855)
- [list of generic font-family keywords is out of date](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2721)
- [typo: miscounted number of generic font families](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2148)
- [Do generic fonts resolve to a single font face value?](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1736)
- [Allow CSS.supports('font-family: system-ui') for feature detection](https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/590)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by svgeesus
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4910#issuecomment-618152366 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 23 April 2020 03:16:22 UTC