Re: [csswg-drafts] "contain exactly" should be a defined term (#4950)

>  of which axis

both: horizontal and vertical. i.e. not diagonal. Clearly, I'm confusing things more than helping with that statement then, so let's drop it.

> Ignoring transforms seems tricky to me

Doing anything other than ignoring transforms would be hard. transforms don't affect layout in any way, it would be *really* weird if they did here. They're always applied after the fact. So I don't think it should be controversial to ignore them. I was wondering if it was so obvious that they would be ignored that it wasn't even worth stating. I guess it's not that obvious then, so it does seem worth stating.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4950#issuecomment-615311892 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 17 April 2020 15:32:18 UTC