- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2020 00:49:09 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
The point of distinguishing between "explicit grid" and "implicit grid" is that the explicit grid was, well, explicitly defined: it's the rows and columns that the author explicitly indicated they're planning for. Under this understading, g-t-a definitely should be considered as defining the explicit grid. Explicitly *sizing* the tracks isn't required under this definition, however. So the current situation, while not quite *planned for*, is totally fine in my book, even if we weren't likely already constrained by web compat as Mats says. So, yeah, we should just fix up the prose around grid-auto-rows/columns to apply to any track that isn't explicitly sized by grid-template-rows/columns. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4914#issuecomment-608925290 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 4 April 2020 00:49:11 UTC