- From: Chris Harrelson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 22:16:03 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> For perspective, I think we could say the nearest (pseudo-)stacking context ancestor, since we don't need/want flattening properties in the middle to break it (and we're explicitly relying on that for the parallax scrolling effects). Could you clarify what you meant by "explicitly relying on that"? Do you mean we're relying on support for intermediate non-stacking context elements between the perspective and transformed elements? @flackr for input also. > I had a chat to @smfr on Friday, and we'd both still prefer to say the DOM parent though, since it's > simpler, and consistent with transform-style. I agree it's simpler and consistent. > Would you be ok with trialing this behaviour, and we can reconsider the approach if there's serious webcompat breakage? Need to check parallax use-cases first.. -- GitHub Notification of comment by chrishtr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/918#issuecomment-608712387 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 3 April 2020 22:16:05 UTC