- From: Brian Birtles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 00:19:55 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Option 1 + not ship `Element.pseudo()` sounds good to me. Will start putting together a Blink intent-to-ship (since we'll need it for web-animations-1) for our side. Just checking, was that an intent-to-implement? I'd like to talk about the behavior of CSS animations/transitions before shipping `getAnimations()`. (Also, I'm curious about your experience with the replacing behavior.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by birtles Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4301#issuecomment-536356441 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 30 September 2019 00:19:56 UTC