Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms-2] Preserve-3d + backface visibility semantics need to be clarified (#918)

For perspective, I think we could say the nearest (pseudo-)stacking context ancestor, since we don't need/want flattening properties in the middle to break it (and we're explicitly relying on that for the parallax scrolling effects).

I had a chat to @smfr on Friday, and we'd both still prefer to say the DOM parent though, since it's
simpler, and consistent with transform-style.

Would you be ok with trialing this behaviour, and we can reconsider the approach if there's serious webcompat breakage?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by mattwoodrow
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/918#issuecomment-533780674 using your GitHub account

Received on Saturday, 21 September 2019 08:45:37 UTC