- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 05:52:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Hi @sideshowbarker, I don't think we can make this a MUST requirement yet... the newer syntax via `overflow-wrap` is not as widely supported, so having a MUST-level requirement to not use this older syntax is not practical to require. If we want to advise a particular authoring practice here, probably the best we can do at the moment is to encourage using the new syntax alongside the old one. -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/4087#issuecomment-529781627 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2019 05:52:24 UTC