W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2019

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images] Should the values of image-orientation include the <angle> variants? (#4164)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 21:35:00 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-548578471-1572557700-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
> We use javascript to read the EXIF orientation and apply it to our images because if we didn't then our app would appear "broken" as everything else actually properly displays their photos.

Then yes, start applying `image-orientation: none` to your images now, to ensure they don't change behavior as browsers update.

> So is image-orientation officially staying in the spec? Earlier in the thread it was said to leave reasons as to why it should stay.

Yes, we're keeping it in precisely so people can use the `none` value, for cases like this.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4164#issuecomment-548578471 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 31 October 2019 21:35:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:55 UTC