- From: Anne van Kesteren via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:22:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
annevk has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [cssom-view] Define additional feature names == https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#the-features-argument-to-the-open()-method See the thread at https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/2464. Note also the conversation at https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/1902#issuecomment-335220972 though. In particular, it seems that passing features at all (even if invalid) ought to trigger a different code path from passing no features. I don't see that reflected in the current algorithm. Furthermore, given that some of these features impact the BarProp attributes, it seems these should either move to CSSOM View as well or perhaps we should define all in HTML? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4432 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2019 17:22:34 UTC