W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2019

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms-2] Serialization of individual transform when the animation is at 0% or 100% (#3290)

From: Stephen McGruer via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 22:37:59 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-539733090-1570574278-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Sorry, I meant to update this last week with the results of my investigations, but I forgot :(. I was originally ready to say "yes, the spec clearly says you always interpolate, Blink is just buggy", but then I found https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4378 and the world got a bit weird again. I held off on updating this issue because I wanted to get that one resolved (if there even is a resolution to be done), but then I didn't do any work to resolve it :(.

> But basd on the serialization part, if it is a 3d trasnform, we should serialize it as a 3d, right?

Maybe I misunderstand, but to Blink this isn't a 3d *scale* (being pedantic, in this case it wasn't a transform ;)) at this point exactly because we've short-circuited the interpolation. And as per  https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms-2/#individual-transform-serialization, 2d scales are just 1-2 numbers.

GitHub Notification of comment by stephenmcgruer
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3290#issuecomment-539733090 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 8 October 2019 22:38:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:54 UTC