The CSS Working Group just discussed `Overflow with auto-repeat and minmax()`, and agreed to the following: * `RESOLVED: Accept change in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4043` <details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary> <dael> Topic: Overflow with auto-repeat and minmax()<br> <dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4043<br> <dael> astearns: fantasai do you want this?<br> <dael> TabAtkins: I'm happy to do it<br> <dael> TabAtkins: We missed where if you do a minmax function and a repeat autofil or autofill we previously based it on max track sizing function. You had to give a real length. minmax(100px, 50px) we would tile columns based on filling 50px and then at layout they're all too big.<br> <dael> TabAtkins: We now floor the max with the min. Need review from impl if they want. Otherwise should be relatively rubber stamp.<br> <dael> astearns: This has had review. Anyone want time?<br> <dael> astearns: Objection to Accept change in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4043 ?<br> <dael> RESOLVED: Accept change in https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4043<br> </details> -- GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4043#issuecomment-556167196 using your GitHub accountReceived on Wednesday, 20 November 2019 17:50:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:56 UTC