- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 10:18:36 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Thus, I would not have expected any font(s) specified after the first generic family to be used. I wouldn't have expected them to cause an error, just that they would not be used. I don't understand this. Unless generic font families are required to produce some glyph for every code point (in other words option 2, which you're not advocating for), then falling through a generic font family to whatever is after it, be it another generic, or a "real" font family, seems to be a logical necessity. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4442#issuecomment-553821772 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2019 10:18:38 UTC